He detailed a conversation he was a part of in 2010 involving Duggar and another witness. “Accordingly, the prior act evidence is probative of defendant’s sexual interest in underage children and his propensity for exploiting young girls.”īefore Holt took the stand Monday, her husband, Jim Holt, was called. “The child pornography victims in this case are approximately the same ages as the victims of defendant’s hands-on child-molestation offenses,” Brooks’ order said. District Judge Timothy Brooks, however, said the testimony was relevant to Duggar’s child pornography case.

But Duggar’s defense attorneys argued Duggar was never charged and that the allegations have no relevance to the child pornography case. Last week, prosecutors said they wanted the jury to hear testimony from a Duggar family friend who testified in a pre-trial hearing Monday that Duggar told her in 2003 that he molested four girls. Josh Duggar trial day 3: DOJ computer forensics expert gives a wealth of evidence putting Duggar at the scene

Dual family pic